BYD Atto 3 vs MG ZS EV — Best Budget Electric SUV (2025 Full Comparison)
The budget electric SUV segment is rapidly growing across Europe and Asia, with two models dominating customer demand: the BYD Atto 3 and the MG ZS EV.
Both are affordable, practical, and packed with advanced technology — but each brings different strengths in range, performance, design, and running costs.
This 2025 comparison reveals which EV offers the best value for money.
1. Design & Build Quality
BYD Atto 3
-
Futuristic, youthful styling
-
High-quality interior materials
-
12.8″ rotating touchscreen (landscape/portrait)
-
Solid build with attention to detail
-
Blue/cream interior theme feels premium

MG ZS EV
-
More traditional SUV design
-
Simpler but practical interior
-
10.1″ central touchscreen
-
Good build quality, but less modern
-
More conservative exterior styling

Winner: BYD Atto 3
More premium interior and a modern, distinctive design.
2. Battery, Range & Efficiency
BYD Atto 3
-
Battery: 60.5 kWh LFP Blade Battery
-
Range: 420–450 km WLTP
-
Real-world efficiency: 14–16 kWh/100 km
-
Outstanding battery longevity and safety
MG ZS EV
-
Battery: 51.1 or 72.6 kWh
-
Range: 320–440 km WLTP (depending on version)
-
Efficiency: 17–19 kWh/100 km
Winner: BYD Atto 3
More range for the battery size and far better efficiency thanks to LFP Blade technology.
3. Charging Speed
-
DC fast charging: up to 88 kW
-
30–80% in ~29 minutes

MG ZS EV
-
DC fast charging: up to 100 kW
-
30–80% in ~36 minutes

Winner: Tie
ZS EV charges slightly faster at peak. Atto 3 is more efficient — overall equal.
4. Performance & Driving
BYD Atto 3
-
150 kW (204 hp)
-
Smooth, linear acceleration
-
Softer suspension = comfortable ride
-
Quieter cabin
MG ZS EV
-
130 kW (176 hp)
-
Strong low-end torque
-
More traditional SUV handling
-
Slightly firmer ride
Winner: BYD Atto 3
More power and better refinement.
5. Technology & Infotainment
-
Rotating 12.8” touchscreen
-
BYD DiLink OS
-
360° camera
-
Advanced ADAS safety package
-
OTA updates

ZS EV
-
10.1” screen
-
MG iSmart system
-
360° camera (in top trims)
-
Good ADAS suite

Winner: BYD Atto 3
More advanced OS and a unique rotating screen.
6. Practicality & Comfort
Atto 3
-
More spacious rear seats
-
Larger boot: 440 L
-
More modern cabin feel
-
High comfort for long trips
ZS EV
-
Boot: 448 L (slightly larger)
-
Slightly more traditional ergonomics
-
Great city car practicality
Winner: Tie
Atto 3 = better passenger space,
ZS EV = slightly bigger boot.
7. Safety
Both SUVs score top marks in crash tests:
-
Euro NCAP: 5 stars for both BYD Atto 3 and MG ZS EV
Winner: Tie
Both are very safe vehicles.
8. Price & Value (Europe & Asia)
BYD Atto 3
-
€38,000–€44,000 (Europe)
-
$24,000–$28,000 (Asia)
MG ZS EV
-
€32,000–€38,000 (Europe)
-
$22,000–$27,000 (Asia)
Winner: MG ZS EV (price)
But Atto 3 offers more tech and refinement.
9. Full Comparison Table
| Feature | BYD Atto 3 | MG ZS EV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | Futuristic | Traditional | Atto 3 |
| Interior | Premium | Practical | Atto 3 |
| Range | 420–450 km | 320–440 km | Atto 3 |
| Efficiency | ✔ Better | Average | Atto 3 |
| Charging | 88 kW | 100 kW | Tie |
| Performance | 204 hp | 176 hp | Atto 3 |
| Comfort | Very good | Good | Atto 3 |
| Boot | 440 L | 448 L | ZS EV |
| Tech | ✔ Advanced | Good | Atto 3 |
| Price | Higher | ✔ Lower | ZS EV |
| Overall Value | Excellent | Very good | Depends |
Final Verdict — Which Is the Best Budget Electric SUV?
Choose the BYD Atto 3 if you want:
-
Best efficiency
-
Strong range
-
Premium interior
-
Advanced tech
-
More power
Choose the MG ZS EV if you want:
-
Lower price
-
Traditional SUV feels
-
Slightly bigger cargo space
-
Simpler interface
Overall Winner (Best All-Around):
BYD Atto 3 — more modern, more efficient, and better long-term value.
